Was Bragg the Confederate Meade?

In posing the question of whether Braxton Bragg was the Confederate George Meade, I don’t mean to imply they were alike in general terms. Rather, I’m focusing on each man’s most celebrated battle in his Civil War career, and the way he reacted to it.

George Meade

George Meade

For Meade that battle was, of course, Gettysburg in July of 1863. In three days of some of the most bloody fighting of the war, Meade won a decisive victory over Robert E. Lee and forced that greatest of Confederate generals into inglorious retreat.

Braxton Bragg’s signal victory was at Chickamauga in north Georgia. In September of 1863 Bragg had one of the greatest Confederate triumphs of the war when he effectively routed the Union’s Army of the Cumberland under General William Rosecrans and forced it to retreat helter-skelter to Chattanooga.

What do these battles and their victorious commanders have in common? Each general had his opponent on the run, but failed to follow up his triumph and effectively destroy the enemy army.

That’s what no less a personage than Abraham Lincoln thought about Meade when that general allowed Robert E. Lee, decisively defeated at Gettysburg, to get his shattered army safely across the Potomac River and back home to Virginia without being attacked. In a letter to Meade that Lincoln finally decided not to send, the anguished President expressed his dismay at what he considered a great opportunity forever lost by Meade’s unwillingness to take the fight to Lee:

Again, my dear general, I do not believe you appreciate the magnitude of the misfortune involved in Lee’s escape. He was within your easy grasp, and to have closed upon him would, in connection with our other late successes, have ended the war.

[See General George G. Meade: Hero Of Gettysburg or Goat?]

Braxton Bragg

Braxton Bragg

Bragg, too, was accused of missing an opportunity that, if successfully pursued, might have brought the war to an early and victorious close. But in Bragg’s case, it wasn’t so much his President as his own subordinate generals who held that view. With a demoralized Federal army in disorganized retreat after the Battle of Chickamauga, Bragg’s generals urged him, in fact pleaded with him to launch an immediate attack before the enemy had opportunity to reorganize and prepare defenses.

But Bragg refused. Instead he allowed Rosecrans and his defeated army to retreat unmolested into Chattanooga. Bragg then placed the Federals under siege, but did not dare to attack them in the formidable defenses he allowed them time to build.

When Ulysses Grant took command of the Union forces in Chattanooga, and proceeded to turn the tables on Bragg, breaking the siege and sending the Confederates scrambling southward in their own humiliating retreat, all the fruits of Bragg’s Chickamauga victory evaporated.

As both Bragg and Meade would later explain, each hung back instead of launching an immediate attack on a foe fleeing in disorderly retreat because he felt that, though victorious, his own army had been rendered too disorganized and vulnerable to risk renewing the battle.

Both these generals are described by contemporaries as personally extremely brave. But when faced with the enormous responsibility of deciding whether to put the victory they had achieved at risk by aggressively following up an enemy that, while wounded, was still capable of hitting back with devastating power, each man hesitated.

That’s how I think Bragg and Meade were alike. Each weighed the risk versus reward equation, and decided that prudence was the better part of valor. And I don’t think either general can be faulted for being prudent rather than rash with so much at stake.

On the other hand, I can’t imagine that had Robert E. Lee been in Bragg’s place, he wouldn’t have gone all out to destroy Rosecrans when he had the opportunity. And if Ulysses S. Grant had been in charge of the Army of the Potomac at Gettysburg, I’m pretty sure Lee would have had to fight every step of the way to make it back to Virginia. There was an aggressiveness in both Lee and Grant that, I believe, would have impelled them to go after a dangerous but vulnerable enemy, while neither Bragg nor Meade dared to do so.

So it was in their lack of the instinct to take ultimate risks, and go for the enemy’s jugular when they had the opportunity, that Bragg and Meade were alike.

Ron Franklin

Posted in Campaigns, Generals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jefferson, who?

This past Wednesday at Bible Study in my church, I was making a point about the necessity of forgiving people who have hurt or offended us. To illustrate the idea that forgiveness is even more important to the one who was offended than it is to the offender, I brought up the name of Jefferson Davis.

“I have to forgive Jefferson Davis,” I said, “even though it won’t make any difference to him at all.”

My point was that even though Jefferson Davis would never know or care that I had forgiven him, forgiving him was crucially important for my own sake. Otherwise I would be held in bondage to my resentment against this long dead individual.

Jefferson Davis

Jefferson Davis

In selecting illustrations, it’s important that they present a picture with which people can quickly and naturally identify. By alluding to Davis, I assumed that everyone would immediately understand the nature of my grievance against him. He was, after all, the president of a Confederacy dedicated to keeping black people in lifelong bondage. To me, he exemplifies the dismissal of the humanity of people of African descent that was a necessary foundation for the maintenance of slavery.

It was very natural for me to identify Jefferson Davis with the necessity of forgiving. Not so with most of the other people in the Bible Study. It was not that they didn’t want to forgive Jefferson Davis; the problem was that many of them didn’t know who he was!

The immediate reaction to my illustration was a lot of blank looks. Finally I had to say that Davis was the Confederate president. Then someone said, “Oh yes, Pastor likes to study the Civil War.”

Most of the people in that Bible Study did not have college degrees, but almost all had graduated high school. By no means were these educationally deprived people. But the name Jefferson Davis drew only blank looks from them. It would seem that the events of the Civil War era are largely unknown to a large proportion of modern Americans.

Now that I’m thinking about it, I’m not sure whether that’s good or bad. Naturally for someone like me, who is fascinated by the war and the people who lived though it, it’s disappointing to see that for most of my contemporaries, the Civil War is truly ancient history. And nobody cares about ancient history.

On the other hand, perhaps we are at a point in our own history where some forgetting is necessary in order for us to move on. There’s nothing healthy in being perpetually aggrieved at offences that occurred 150 years ago.

Here are some of my articles that involve Jefferson Davis:

Why Abraham Lincoln Refused To Respect Jefferson Davis
Mary Elizabeth Bowser: Union Spy In The Confederate White House
Jefferson Davis Loses His Plantation in the Battle of Vicksburg
Jefferson Davis Wanted to Invade the North Long Before Gettysburg

Ron Franklin

Posted in Jefferson Davis, Slavery, The Confederacy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why are those happy slaves shooting at us?

Slavery as it exists in America-loc'gov@pictures@resource@cph'3a05113

“Slavery as it exists in America” 1850. Library of Congress

Throughout the Civil War, many Southern whites professed an unwavering conviction that their slaves were happy and content in their bondage, and extremely loyal to their masters. That comforting belief was reinforced again and again by newspaper accounts claiming that whenever slaves ran away into Union-controlled territory, it was because they were kidnapped by Yankees and forced to go.

A typical example of this type of story was carried in the January 3, 1863 edition of the Richmond Daily Dispatch. In the wake of President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, issued on January 1, 1863, the Dispatch reported on the efforts of “Abolition Generals Hunter and Sexton” to recruit blacks into the Union army at Beaufort, South Carolina. The article said:

The negro brigade proved a failure. Conscription was resorted to to fill its ranks. Guards were sent to Beaufort from the camp to arrest and bring before the recruiting officers such negroes as were physically competent to serve in the army, that they might volunteer into the Black Brigade – at least get into it in some shape or other. The poor fellows attempted to resist, but found it of no avail. They attempted to hide from their pursuers, but they were hunted like dogs, and dragged out of their houses, from barns, cellars, and taken from their wives and families, that they might enjoy the privilege of volunteering.

From accounts such as these, it must have seemed to readers of the Confederate press that the ex-slaves who were undeniably fighting in Northern armies had been dragged kicking and screaming into the ranks.

Black troops near Dutch Gap canal

Black troops near Dutch Gap canal in Virginia in 1864

Yet of the 180,000 black men who served in Union blue during the war, at least half, about 90,000, were former slaves from Confederate states. And 25 African American soldiers and sailors were awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for their gallantry in combat. That these were all unwilling victims of Yankee coercion must have become less and less believable as the war wore on.

Still, the comforting notion that the slaves remained loyal to their masters continued to be widespread in the South throughout the war. In June of 1865, two months after the Confederate surrender at Appomattox, Mary Chesnut wrote an entry in her “Diary From Dixie” alluding to the “negro slaves whom they (the Yankees) tried to seduce.”

Comforting delusions die hard.

Ron Franklin

Posted in Slavery, USCT | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment